AR Quality Inspection: Every Check Recorded Against the Exact Spot It Was Made

Running an inspection with the checklist, tolerances and reference model shown against the actual item, on a phone, tablet or headset, and recording each finding with the position it was made from. The augmented reality part is the delivery. The part that makes the record durable is the coordinate underneath it.

Capture the space again and align the new scan to the active baseline. Because both are in the same metric coordinate frame, they can be compared directly rather than by eye. Alignment works across different capture hardware and months apart, which matters because the second scan is rarely taken the same way as the first.

Accurate enough to distinguish the item from its neighbours. In a plant room with six identical valves, metre-level positioning tells you nothing useful and centimetre-level settles it. For inspecting a specific component on a part rather than finding the part, object tracking is the right tool and works to sub-millimetre from a 3D model.

Yes, and they resolve into the same coordinate frame, which is the point. A drone inspecting a flare stack and a technician on the ground produce findings in one shared map, so the two records are comparable rather than living in separate systems.

Yes. Position comes from matching the camera view against a prebuilt map, not from satellites, so it works indoors, under pipe racks and inside vessels where GNSS is unavailable or reports a confidently wrong fix. Outdoor areas of a site are mapped the same way and stitch into one continuous frame with the interiors.

Wherever your compliance position requires. Public cloud, single-tenant private VPC, self-hosted on your own hardware, or fully on-device with no outbound call. Inspection imagery of a regulated facility is usually the most sensitive data in the deployment, and it is treated that way.